Additionally, THC is different than CBD, or cannabidiol, which does not produce a high. THC is the actual compound in the plant that produces a “high” and is what is typically looked for during testing. However, you should also be familiar with the term THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol. I’m using the word marijuana throughout this article to make things as simple as possible. ( A quick note on the wording of this article: The terminology in this area is complex. The positivity rate for marijuana has at least doubled over the past five years in six of the industries. Of those industries, 15 saw double-digit increases in marijuana positivity. saw increases in positivity for marijuana from 2020-2021. The 2022 Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index found that all of the industries it looked at in the U.S. Recent data show that these drug tests are coming back positive for marijuana use more often than before. It can be difficult to know if a positive marijuana result may cause you to miss out on opportunities. While their use have decreased over the years, many jobs still require drug tests. can cause some headaches for job seekers and workers if they’re not careful. The patchwork legal landscape surrounding marijuana in the U.S. Then there is the matter of the federal government still considering marijuana a controlled substance. For example, many of the dispensaries operating in New York are doing so with creative business practices or without consent from the state. The legal landscape regarding the use of marijuana in New York and throughout the United States is very complex. These businesses are the result of the state of New York largely legalizing recreational marijuana for adults in 2021. A few brick-and-mortar dispensaries have popped up around the city as well. The vehicles are often mobile dispensaries that sell marijuana products. You’re bound to see one or two every day - especially in Midtown Manhattan. Some states have taken steps to protect workers, but it may take some digging to find out if that applies to you.īuses and vans wrapped with images of marijuana leaves are a common sight nowadays in New York City. Also, some employers require drug tests as a condition of employment. The federal government still outlaws the distribution of marijuana. These steps present a complex legal issue. states have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes over the past several years. He is the author of “Lobbying For Equality,” published earlier this year by HUC Press.An increasing number of U.S. Gerard Leval is a partner in the Washington office of a national law firm.hospital, she might herself live to regret this legacy. Should she ever need assistance at a D.C. This would be a dismal legacy for the vice president. It may very well be that Vice President Kamala Harris could cast the deciding vote that will make this act the law of the District of Columbia. However, in light of the priorities of the party, which, for the moment, still controls Congress, it is highly unlikely that Congress will impede the act. Efforts should be exerted in that direction. Council are subject to a review by Congress, there is still hope that this act will be stopped on Capitol Hill. Any encouragement of such use is, therefore, highly undesirable. It is now increasingly recognized that the use of cannabis is addictive, mind-altering and particularly detrimental to pregnant women, the young and those with mental challenges. Council’s action is even more difficult to understand in light of the increasing evidence of the harm that cannabis use can and does cause. It could be suggested that the only real beneficiaries of this new act will be the purveyors of cannabis. Council will simply make any effort to curtail cannabis use while on the job much more difficult. The text of the act as passed by the D.C. Council’s decision has been taken virtually simultaneously with the Biden administration’s decision to try to limit, if not totally eliminate, the nicotine from cigarettes because of the nefarious impact of nicotine on public health. Council would see fit to protect users of a mind-altering substance in the context of the rendering of services to an employer or to the public. Department of Human Resources, empowered to enforce the act, will so circumscribe these exceptions that employers will be reluctant to invoke them. The act does purport to create some modest exceptions to its coverage, such as excluding “positions requiring the supervision or care of children, medical patients, or vulnerable persons.” However, it can safely be anticipated that the D.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |